30 Comments
User's avatar
FionnM's avatar

>Some people, especially women, will try to discredit an obviously-applicable generalization by pointing out an exception, when by their very nature, everyone knows that a generalization is supposed to be a shortcut tool that does not have to be true all the time to be a very useful and very applicable tool.

The funny thing is, statements like "the average woman is five-foot-four" or "the average black American is heavier than the average white American" are not even generalisations: they are just factually true statements. A woman who is five-foot-eight is not even an exception to the statement "the average woman is five-foot-four". The very concept of a mean presupposes that some entities in a population will fall above and below that average. "But I'm a woman, and I'm five-foot-eight" does not contradict the statement "the average woman is five-foot-four" in any way.

🅽🅾🆃 Konzzzs's avatar

Feminists rarely had any problem with generalizing men.

If what you’re saying is true, then this would only apply to a few topics that are close to them.

Rollo Tomassi's avatar

This is why transgenderism doesn’t exist. You’re not Trans. You’re just gay and boring. You’re not a “demi-boy” or whatever ‘Furries’ are. You’re gay and boring, and you need a +1 to feel special.

Archwinger's avatar

Trans-women is really just gay-plus-misogyny.

They see women as no-effort beautiful, desired by men, having easier lives, etc. Raging with jealousy, they put on woman costumes the same way white racists used to put on black-face.

What are these woman costumes like? Garish. Flamboyant. Hyper-sexual. Child-like. Because THIS is how they see women. THIS is what they think women are like. Their woman costumes are their critique on women. They hate women and see them as free to be hypersexual attention-seeking children, and are jealous they can't have that life.

A real woman reads to kids at the library wearing jeans and a T-shirt with normal hair and makeup. Not an evening gown or lingerie.

Trans-men is a bit of a different beast. It's more common among the segment of the female population who goes to a therapist to get a label they can use for an identity.

Being "normal" doesn't get any extra attention.

agoramania's avatar

Literally no one likes being generalized. There's a reason people roll their eyes at feminists when they make blanket statements about men

Archwinger's avatar

Being underestimated rocks. You can get so much farther than if you're uppity and always trying to prove that you're exceptional and awesome

Fell Choice's avatar

Yeah, but I like being the target of generalizations

Sam Ursu's avatar

If it makes you feel better, Russian doesn't even have a verb for "to be". If you're an engineer you say "I engineer." 😁

Archwinger's avatar

Weirdly, lots of languages don't. Though that's only weird to me because I grew up speaking English. All these unnecessary filler words let us color the way we say something just a little differently. We perceive the world and express ourselves just slightly differently as a result. Take 10,000 little language things like that and you start to see the root of some of our cultural differences.

CompCat's avatar

I just realized that if you know every language you can identify gendered domination quotient, which of course is only a state since culture can change language norms. But yeah language basically betrays whos who and what's what if you're a sophisticated interpreter. Very powerful.

f_d's avatar

You're all individuals. Sorry you had to find out this way.

Peter L.'s avatar

This statement is textbook example of the moralistic fallacy.

**CHAOS [ JUNG ] CLPWN**'s avatar

egocentrically self-interest driven. we knew it all along. you used too many words pal.

**CHAOS [ JUNG ] CLPWN**'s avatar

We knew it since before Weimar lads, let’s not fuck around here @Iain McGilchrist, @Máté Gábor?  Concur retard @Jordan B Peterson? ;o) hehehe daddy @Peter Thiel, IT will run rings around all of them. All day. All night. @Rupert Lowe ;o) x

**CHAOS [ JUNG ] CLPWN**'s avatar

Where did you guys wanna Weimar start? Child prostitution? Prostitution? Snuff? Child snuff? Child giveaways for bags of food? Fucking amateurs @Rupert Lowe

Codebra's avatar

All of this applies almost exclusively to Western secular people, who are *primarily animals*.

Peter Andrew Nolan's avatar

All women are exactly the same.

Carlos's avatar

Men who are not chuds also loathe generalizations. Redpillers told me 100 times as a man I should be more interested in sex than in relationships. Well, I am not. Sex can be replaced by masturbation or visiting prostitutes. Acceptance, validation, love, connection, companionship are priceless.

"Before stumbling across The Red Pill, most of us internet men grew up believing the “blue pill” story. Work hard in school, get a good job, become someone who can support a wife and kids, be nice, kind, generous, and respectful to everyone - especially women."

These men are idiots. Probably of the religious conservative kind from some backwards place? Time machine right back to 1970 or what? Already when I was 18 in 1996 I knew it is far more about dressing and grooming like some boy-band fuckboy and going to night clubs and having swagger. And having relationships that last 6-9 months until she gets bored of me - or I of her.

And marriage is something for 35+ when I will be too tired to do this anymore, marrying a 32 years old woman who also got tired of it.

And NOT expecting the marriage to last! When you already have a kid or two, so the achievement is unlocked, there is nothing wrong with being single again and chasing the also divorced chicks for short-term relationships.

Seriously I knew all this decades ago. What kind of bubble you lived in?

Gnorp's avatar

How do you know that a woman’s core identity revolves around believing they are special and unique?

Dee's avatar

But men love it when people make negative generalizations about them?

Archwinger's avatar

100% serious about this: being constantly underestimated and never well-understood is literally a superpower

Chris Marcon's avatar

I'm reminded of the speech in Hamlet act III . it demonstrates the red pill blue pill dilema sort of.. but maybe Hamlet was more black pill really

Archwinger's avatar

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

Evan Marc Katz's avatar

Good analysis. Yet the answer to all questions is not red pill vs blue pill, but rather, what would a purple pill look like?

Fell Choice's avatar

A genetic mod that makes sperm addictive. Of course.

Zorost's avatar

"“The average woman is 5’4”, to which a woman poster replies “But I’m 5’8”, captioned “This is all arguments with women.”"

This meme has been updated. Please replace old version with new version in your meme folders. Thank you for your attention to this subject.

https://i.ibb.co/j9wyTsdg/women-logic.jpg